Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Leading by Example

As we have all grown up, we have had people that we look up to. The examples our parents, older siblings, relatives, and even teachers showed are what have helped shape our own attitudes and behaviors about life. If we are older siblings or have younger relatives, we have heard about being a good "role model." There are people who look at our actions as examples of how to act, just as we have looked to our elders.

This happens in the workplace as well. If we see a manager talking on their cell phone in the back room, we assume that we can do it as well. If they are acting unethically by lying to a customer, misrepresenting financial figures, or practicing favoritism, we assume that these are acceptable behaviors to use as well.

Hewlett Packard's CEO Mark Hurd was a successful leader in the company, and was even considered a "TopGunCEO" by Brendan Wood International, an advisory agency, in 2009. He had a lot of success and was a good example of how to lead effectively, and ethically, as far as the public was concerned.

However, in April of 2010, he was sued for sexual harassment by a former contractor. He was not convicted, but was found to have acted unethically in the workplace. According to this article on huffingtonpost.com, "Hurd's 'systematic pattern' of submitting falsified financial reports to hide the relationship convinced the board that 'it would be impossible for him to be an effective leader moving forward and that he had to step down,' HP general counsel Michael Holston said."

This brings us to the question of leadership ethics. In our book we read about how ethics is defined. Page 378 relates ethics in this way:
            "Ethics is concerned with the kinds of values and morals an individual or society finds desirable or appropriate."                          and,
            "The choices leaders make and how they respond in a given circumstance are informed and directed by their ethics.'

This article also gives good examples on considering if we act ethically or not in the workplace, and even mentions Mark Hurd's situation. 

Hurd did not have very strong values or morals concerning honesty and following company policies. The appropriateness of paying a woman for work she did not do and the choice he made in this circumstance heavily relay the message of just how unethical Hurd really was/is.
 

"Hurd acknowledged there were 'instances in which I did not live up to the standards and principles of trust, respect and integrity that I have espoused at HP.'"

He was found to have falsified expense reports and other financial documents to conceal the relationship with the woman who had sued him. We can all agree that falsifying reports is not right and is an unethical practice. But what is he showing those who look up to him? The article states that he has two children, now what is he showing those kids? How can they look up to a father who helped a company prosper, yet had to find another job because he lied in financial documents in the end?

Considering an article I posted before in this blog concerning the severance packages of unethical leaders, Hurd was given a $12.2 million severance payment and nearly 350,000 shares of HP stock worth about $16 million. Now what kind of example does this give? Even though he lied he still left millions of dollars richer?

Overall, leaders have a choice to make while in their positions. They can act ethically within the domains of conduct and character (Page 378 in our book explains theories on conduct and character; look to Table 15:1), or they can chose another route.

If they are successful enough before the cheating, lying, etc., they may receive millions of dollars upon their severance from the company, thus creating a great example for those who look up to these leaders. 

-Melissa Beechy

9 comments:

  1. I completely agree. Just because these people were THOUGHT highly of and were successful, and they get fired, they should not receive severance packages. I feel that if you are fired for being unethical you should receive nothing; or maybe even have to pay into the company. For example, when people lie on their taxes about how much money they make and they are caught by the IRS, (I'm not exactly sure of what happens) but they are fined and may even receive jail time. That's being unethical and those people are penalized. So why should a CEO who is fired for being unethical, still receive a severance package???

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with the statement that "This happens in the workplace as well. If we see a manager talking on their cell phone in the back room, we assume that we can do it as well. If they are acting unethically by lying to a customer, misrepresenting financial figures, or practicing favoritism, we assume that these are acceptable behaviors to use as well."

    I currently work in a place that has very influential environment. The management does their best to keep us on task by staying on task themselves. I believe all companies can avoid unethical situations if their CEO is following the ethical practices they shoudl be. By setting an example for their employees, they will have a decline in unethical decisions throughout the company.

    I do not believe that unethical actions should receive severance packages, they should recieve nothing. I completely agree with Jessica. I don't think it matters how long you've been with the company. I think that all unethical actions should not recieve anything at all. This specific scenario would be setting an example to the employees that if they behave unethically they would be to recieve packages as well.

    -Lauren Mowers

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree too. It is obvious that this leader have a higher degree of concern for self-interest and low conern for the interest of others. In some way, it feels like the company support this unethical behaviors when they made him millions of dollars richer. I think the company can find problem in the future to find new good role models if they keep rewarding (you can see this severance package as a reward an unetichal CEO.

    Eva-Lena Juhlin

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. First of all, I am completely fine with leaders and CEO's acting for their own self interest, as long as they are acting ethically and being good to their followers. In the example that Melissa gave about Mark Hurd, I felt that his actions were absolutely unacceptable the way he covered up is "fling" with a woman he worked with.

    This is providing a horrible example not only for the people he works with but for anyone else who comes in contact with him in the future. And like Melissa stated, how can he expect his kids to look up and follow by example when their father is a liar and has little morals or values.

    To top it all off, he gets paid over twelve million dollars for acting against the ways we have always been taught to ethically act. I understand the reason for severance packages but I think there is a fine line that once crossed there should be no rewards what so ever!


    -Kyle Turner

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I like what Jessica had to say about the IRS and how CEO's should have to pay into the company if found acting in an unethical way. I get the feeling that since people in the business world are viewed as the most prestige professionals in some eyes, that they get leeway when they mess up, similar to professional athletes. I think that society as a whole needs to move away from looking at peoples job titles and rather look at whether they are acting ethical or not. Everyone should be held to the same ethical standards and nobody should get a break, let alone a reward!

    -Kyle Turner

    ReplyDelete
  8. I also believe that peple need to start looking outside the box when delivering severance packages. Just because a specific person has a title, does not mean they are more or less qualified than someone else. In this specific scenario, I believe he should receive a minimized severance package because he did cross a line that goes against many ethical issues. If this was an error that could have been an accident, then there would be more consideration for a severance package. This scenario could and should have been avoided. I believe with Kyle that everyone should be held to the same ethical standards, no matter what their title.

    -Lauren Mowers

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Overall, leaders have a choice to make while in their positions. They can act ethically within the domains of conduct and character (Page 378 in our book explains theories on conduct and character; look to Table 15:1), or they can chose another route."

    Concerning the table I was referring to, I just wanted to mention a little more detail. By falsifying the financial documents and covering up his actions, Hurd was displaying ethical egoism.


    Ethical egoism is considered as a consequence of certain conducts in the domains of ethical theories (table 15:1). According to the book, "Ethical egoism states that a person should act so as to create the greatest good for herself or himself."

    Hurd did not act in the greatest good for the greatest number. If he did, he would be displaying utilitarianism. This is something all leaders should be displaying. A good example of utilitarianism in the book concerns allocating a large part of the federal budget for preventative health care rather than for catastrophic illnesses, thus helping more citizens in the long run.

    Another option for Hurd (or leaders in general) would be to display the opposite of ethical egoism. This would be altruism, and is defined in the book as "an approach that suggests that actions are moral if their primary purpose is to promote the best interests of others." This is ideally what I feel all leaders should practice. As a leader, it is your duty to help and influence all of your followers, thus acting in a way to promote their best interests.

    The way Hurd acted was selfish, unethical and the epitome of ethical egoism.

    -Melissa Beechy

    ReplyDelete